Abstract

Recent studies have established SIRT1 as an important regulator of lipid metabolism, although the mechanism of its action at the molecular level has not been revealed. Here, we show that knockdown of SIRT1 with the help of small hairpin RNA decreases basal and isoproterenol-stimulated lipolysis in cultured adipocytes. This effect is attributed, at least in part, to the suppression of the rate-limiting lipolytic enzyme, adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL), at the level of transcription. Mechanistically, SIRT1 controls acetylation status and functional activity of FoxO1 that directly binds to the ATGL promoter and regulates ATGL gene transcription. We have also found that depletion of SIRT1 decreases AMP-dependent protein kinase (AMPK) activity in adipocytes. To determine the input of AMPK in regulation of lipolysis, we have established a stable adipose cell line that expresses a dominant-negative α1 catalytic subunit of AMPK under the control of the inducible TET-OFF lentiviral expression vector. Reduction of AMPK activity does not have a significant effect on the rates of lipolysis in this cell model. We conclude, therefore, that SIRT1 controls ATGL transcription primarily by deacetylating FoxO1.

Highlights

  • Recent studies have established SIRT1 as an important regulator of lipid metabolism, the mechanism of its action at the molecular level has not been revealed

  • Polyclonal antibodies against adipose triglyceride lipase (ATGL), SIRT1, perilipin, acetylated lysine, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ␥ (PPAR␥), AMP-dependent protein kinase (AMPK), and all the phospho-specific antibodies were from Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA)

  • To determine the role of SIRT1 in lipolysis, its expression was significantly attenuated by constitutive production of a SIRT1-shRNA in 3T3-L1 adipocytes employing a retroviral vector as described previously [33]

Read more

Summary

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Polyclonal antibodies against ATGL, SIRT1, perilipin, acetylated lysine, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ␥ (PPAR␥), AMPK, and all the phospho-specific antibodies were from Cell Signaling (Beverly, MA). Polyclonal antibody against FoxO1 and 4E-BP1 was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Monoclonal antibody against adiponectin was from Abcam (Cambridge, MA). Monoclonal anti-Flag tag antibody and monoclonal anti-␤-actin antibody were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Polyclonal antibody against HSL was a gift from Dr A. A rabbit polyclonal antibody against cellugyrin was described previously [32]. Monoclonal anti-V5 tag antibody was from Invitrogen

Cell culture
Transient transfections and reporter gene assays
RNA extraction and quantitative PCR
Lipolysis assay
Chromatin immunoprecipitation
Gel electrophoresis and Western blotting
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call