Abstract
•Radiologists should know the atypical CT findings of COVID-19 pneumonia as well as the typical ones•A single focal halo-sign lesion has never been described before as manifestation of COVID-19 pneumonia•CT halo-sign could represent a consequence of thrombotic damage of pulmonary microcirculation•In the setting of asymptomatic patients, unilateral single halo-sign should alert to the possibility of COVID-19 pneumonia We read with great interest the article by McLaren et al., recently published in Clinical Imaging.[1]McLaren T.A. Gruden J.F. Green D.B. The Bullseye sign: a variant of the reverse halo sign in COVID-19 pneumonia.Clin Imaging. 2020; 68: 191-196https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.07.024Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (15) Google Scholar We agree on the importance of describing atypical CT findings in COVID-19 to better and more comprehensively understand this newly emerged disease and on the effort of correlating pathologic alterations (as diffuse alveolar damage, organizing pneumonia, microthrombi and hemorrhagic infarcts) with CT findings. We think CT could be a useful tool to enlighten its pathophysiology through the study of the abnormalities that we can observe with High Resolution Chest CT (HRCT) at a very high anatomical detail. McLaren et al. described the bullseye sign, a variant of the reverse halo sign, as an atypical manifestation of COVID-19 pneumonia. Similarly, Poerio et al.[2]Poerio A. Sartoni M. Lazzari G. et al.Halo, reversed halo, or both? Atypical computed tomography manifestations of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pneumonia: the “double halo sign”.Korean J Radiol. 2020; 21: 1161-1164https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0687Crossref PubMed Scopus (7) Google Scholar described a combination of multiple and bilateral halo sign, reverse halo sign and double halo sign as main CT findings in a 55 year-old woman with COVID-19. Both authors explained these atypical findings as manifestations of organizing pneumonia (reverse halo sign) and extensive thrombotic damage of pulmonary microcirculation (halo sign and double halo sign). At our center, a reference hospital for COVID-19 in Northern Italy, we collected a large series of chest X-ray and CT in symptomatic patients with suspicion and/or confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among these, we believe it could be useful to describe the case of a 42 year-old male nurse presented with a 2 days history of arthromyalgia and an isolated episode of fever up to 38 °C (100.4 °F). At admission, laboratory studies showed leucopenia and elevated C-reactive protein (15.2 mg/L); a positive rapid antigen test confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Chest x-ray showed no alterations, whereas a chest CT showed, as single finding, a rounded consolidation surrounded by ground-glass opacity (halo sign) in the left lower lobe (Fig. 1). The patient was then discharged to quarantine at home. Asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic COVID-19 patients might have normal chest CT[3]Kwee T.C. Kwee R.M. Chest CT in COVID-19: what the radiologist needs to know.RadioGraphics. 2020; 40: 1848-1865https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2020200159Crossref PubMed Scopus (160) Google Scholar; in case of lung abnormalities, CT findings are frequently unilateral (58.6%).[4]Heng M. Xiong R. He R. et al.CT imaging and clinical course of asymptomatic cases with COVID-19 pneumonia at admission in Wuhan, China.J Infect. 2020; 81: e33-e39https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.004Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (169) Google Scholar Moreover, Shi et al. reported that the predominant pattern in early stages is characterized by unilateral, although multifocal GGO.5.Shi H. Han X. Jiang N. et al.Radiological findings from 81 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a descriptive study.Lancet Infect Dis. 2020; 20: 425e34https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30086-4Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (2238) Google Scholar To the best of our knowledge, a single focal halo-sign lesion has never been described before as manifestation of COVID-19 pneumonia. Halo sign has rather been observed, in the context of more typical CT findings, as multiple and bilateral lesions, sometimes associated with reverse CT halo sign.[6]Shaghaghi S. Daskareh M. Irannejad M. et al.Target-shaped combined halo and reversed-halo sign, an atypical chest CT finding in COVID-19.Clin Imaging. 2020; 69: 72-74https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.06.038Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar Halo-sign is non-specific and histopathologically usually represents alveolar edema and hemorrhage.[7]Pinto P.S. The CT halo sign.Radiology. 2004; 230: 109-110Crossref PubMed Scopus (72) Google Scholar Although different from the bullseye sign, the lesion we presented showed connection to the vascular system too, as suggested from a pulmonary vein branch reaching it. Thus, it is likely that in SARS-Cov-2 infection halo sign represent a consequence of thrombotic damage of pulmonary microcirculation. In conclusion, we believe that radiologists should know the atypical CT findings of COVID-19 pneumonia as well as the typical ones. In the setting of asymptomatic patients and in case of short time between symptom onset and hospital admission, the presence of unilateral single halo-sign should alert to the possibility of COVID-19 pneumonia. No conflict of interest or industry support for the two authors.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.