Single dose vs prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis of fosfomycin for transrectal prostate biopsy: a single-center prospective, randomized, controlled trial

Abstract

BackgroundTransrectal prostate biopsy is a commonly performed urological procedure in which antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended. Fluoroquinolone-type antibiotics are no longer acceptable in the EU. Fosfomycin-trometamol may be used, but there is no evidence regarding its ideal dose and administration time. MethodsPatients who underwent prostate biopsy between 2021 and 2023 were evaluated prospectively. 204 patients were randomized into two arms: 102 patients (Arm A) received a single dose of fosfomycin-trometamol one hour before surgery, and 102 patients (Arm B) received one additional dose of fosfomycin-trometamol 48 hours after the first dose. Urine tests and questionnaires were administered during the postoperative period and the subsequent four weeks to identify any symptoms, infectious, or other complications. ResultsThere was no statistical difference in the rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria (4.90% (5) vs 8.82% (9), p = 0.27) symptomatic UTI (0% (0) vs 1.96% (2), p = 0.50), or febrile UTI (0% (0) vs 0.98% (1), p = 1) between the groups. Only haematuria was significantly more common in Arm B (6.86% (7) vs 16.67% (17), p = 0.03), whereas other complications did not differ significantly. There was no statistical difference in hospitalization (0.98% (1) vs 2.94 (3), p = 0.62) or mortality rate (0 % (0) vs 0.98% (1), p = 1). Sub-group analysis of previous antibiotic users showed no difference in terms of complications. ConclusionThere is no significant difference in infectious complications between single dose and prolonged prophylaxis of fosfomycin-trometamol for transrectal prostate biopsy. A single dose of fosfomycin one hour before biopsy is an ideal choice with a better ecological impact compared with prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy.