Single‐ and Twin‐Row Peanut Production within Narrow and Wide Strip Tillage Systems

Abstract

Increased production costs and potential benefits of maintaining surface residue has renewed interest in conservation tillage systems for peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) production. We determined surface residue cover from rye (Secale cereale L.) or oat (Avena sativa L.) cover crops after two strip tillage systems (narrow vs. wide) and planting operations with different row configurations (single vs. twin). We also compared plant populations, yields, and total sound mature kernels for three peanut cultivars (‘ANorden’, ‘AP‐3’, and ‘Georgia‐02C’) across each treatment combination. Seven site‐years were examined across similar soil types in Alabama and northern Florida during the 2004 to 2006 growing seasons. The highest surface residue counts were for the narrow tillage system planted in single rows. Final plant stands were influenced by an interaction between cultivar and row configuration, with ‘ANorden’ planted in single rows below recommended rates. Peanut yields were affected by strip tillage system and row configuration, but differences among cultivars were also observed. Twin‐row peanut yields were 5% greater than single‐row peanut yields in the narrow strip tillage system but were similar across strip tillage systems. Cultivars ‘AP‐3’ and ‘Georgia‐02C’ yielded 20% higher than ‘ANorden’. Total sound mature kernels were only affected by peanut cultivar, with the cultivar ‘Georgia‐02C’ producing the highest‐quality peanut, followed by ‘ANorden’ and ‘AP‐3’. These results indicate that growers interested in using twin rows for peanut production can also take advantage of a narrow strip tillage system that maximizes surface residue coverage and subsequent benefits.