Abstract

Singapore has built a social welfare model based on a small-scale social security system that emphasizes personal and family roles in basic health care, pension, and child care while focusing on government functions in public services, such as housing, transportation, education, and employment. This social welfare model allows Singapore to make social progress while at the same time avoiding the burden of a welfare state. China and Singapore have the same ideology of social welfare and similar social assistance systems, while Singapore’s public welfare system of quantitatively large services is in line with the requirements and objectives of China’s social security reform. Singapore’s housing system, social services, and concept of public services have had varying degrees of impact on China. However, there is a gap between the results of Singapore’s social welfare policy and its economic strength, social development needs, and national aspirations, which China should avoid. At the same time, China’s existing public welfare mechanism is superior to Singapore’s.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.