Abstract

Hydrogen and ethanol are promising biofuels and of great potential to become alternatives to fossil fuels. In this work, two bioreactor systems, namely fluidized-bed (FBR) and packed-bed (PBR), were developed to produce H 2 and ethanol simultaneously from dark fermentation of carbohydrate substrates using polyethylene–octane elastomer immobilized anaerobic sludge as the biocatalyst. The H 2 and ethanol production in FBR essentially increased with increasing upflow velocity ( v up ), as sucrose and fructose was better substrate for the yield of H 2 and ethanol, respectively. With FBR operated at v up = 0.91 cm s − 1 , sucrose gave the highest H 2 production rate (59 mmol h −1 l −1) among the three sugar substrates (sucrose, glucose, and fructose) tested, but the best H 2 yield (1.04 mol mol hexose −1) was obtained with glucose at v up = 0.55 cm s − 1 . For ethanol production in FBR, fructose was the favorable substrate, resulting in maximum ethanol production rate and yield of 378 mmol h −1 l −1 and 0.65 mol mol hexose −1, respectively, when operating at v up = 0.91 cm s − 1 . At a hydraulic retention time of 4 h, the PBR system produced H 2 and ethanol at a slower rate of 16 and 6 mmol h −1 l −1, respectively, by using glucose. However, the yields of H 2 and ethanol were comparable to those for FBR. The soluble metabolites were dominated by ethanol, accounting for 43–65% of total soluble microbial products. The production of acetate and butyrate was less significant when compared to cultures optimized for H 2 production. Comparison of the yield of H 2 and ethanol shows that production of H 2 and ethanol was reversely correlated. The total energy generation based on the heat values of H 2 and ethanol was calculated to assess the overall efficiency of energy production. In FBR, the energy generation rate was higher when a faster upflow velocity was used. The best energy generation rate and yield was 526 kJ h −1 l −1 and 1048 kJ mol hexose −1, respectively, both occurred with fructose-feeding FBR operated at v up = 0.91 cm s − 1 . The PBR system displayed a lower energy generation rate, whereas the energy yield was comparable or even higher than those for FBR.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call