Abstract

Limited pedestrian microcosmic simulation models focus on the interactions between pedestrians and vehicles at unmarked roadways. Pedestrians tend to head to the destinations directly through the shortest path. So, pedestrians have inclined trajectories pointing destinations. Few simulation models have been established to describe the mechanisms underlying the inclined trajectories when pedestrians cross unmarked roadways. To overcome these shortcomings, achieve solutions for optimal design features before implementation, and help to make the design more rational, the paper establishes a modified social force model for interactions between pedestrians and vehicles at unmarked roadways. To achieve this goal, stop/go decision-making model based on gap acceptance theory and conflict avoidance models were developed to make social force model more appropriate in simulating pedestrian crossing behaviors at unmarked roadways. The extended model enables the understanding and judgment ability of pedestrians about the traffic environment and guides pedestrians to take the best behavior to avoid conflict and keep themselves safe. The comparison results of observed pedestrians’ trajectories and simulated pedestrians’ trajectories at one unmarked roadway indicate that the proposed model can be used to simulate pedestrian crossing behaviors at unmarked roadways effectively. The proposed model can be used to explore pedestrians’ trajectories variation at unmarked roadways and improve pedestrian safety facilities.

Highlights

  • Unlike pedestrians at the marked and signalized roadways, pedestrians at unmarked roadways are not restricted by the crosswalk boundary, so their trajectories have a wider variation, which results in a wider range distribution of conflict points

  • There is no simulation model which can be directly applied to pedestrian crossing behaviors at unmarked roadways, because pedestrians at unmarked roadways have more flexible stop/go decision-making and conflict avoidance mechanism without restrictions from crosswalk and signal

  • Based on the SFM, a modified and extended social force model of pedestrian-car mixed traffic flow at unmarked roadways which is capable of reproducing the behaviors and trajectories of pedestrians at unmarked road is established and it can be implemented in traffic design scheme assessment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Unlike pedestrians at the marked and signalized roadways, pedestrians at unmarked roadways are not restricted by the crosswalk boundary, so their trajectories have a wider variation, which results in a wider range distribution of conflict points. Considering more realistic behaviors, existing forcebased models have been developed by modifying the SFM established by Helbing and Molnar [9] Other models, such as gap-acceptance-based models, can be combined in social force model. There is no simulation model which can be directly applied to pedestrian crossing behaviors at unmarked roadways, because pedestrians at unmarked roadways have more flexible stop/go decision-making and conflict avoidance mechanism without restrictions from crosswalk and signal. Based on the SFM, a modified and extended social force model of pedestrian-car mixed traffic flow at unmarked roadways which is capable of reproducing the behaviors and trajectories of pedestrians at unmarked road is established and it can be implemented in traffic design scheme assessment. The paper effectively combines the stop/ go decision-making model and conflict avoidance mechanism of pedestrians into social force model.

Social Force Model
Modified Social Force Model for Pedestrians
Social Force Model for Vehicles
A Bi exp rBi BBi
Calibration and Simulation
Start position
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call