Abstract

Urban flooding as a result of inadequate drainage capacity, failure of flood defenses, etc. is usually featured with highly transient hydrodynamics. Reliable and efficient prediction and forecasting of these urban flash floods is still a great technical challenge. Meanwhile, in urban environments, the flooding hydrodynamics and process may be influenced by flow regulation and flood protection hydraulic infrastructure systems, such as sluice gates, which should be effectively taken into account in an urban flood model. However, direct simulation of hydraulic structures is not a current practice in 2D urban flood modeling. This work aims to develop a robust numerical approach to directly simulate the effects of gate structures in a 2D high-resolution urban flood model. A new modeling component is developed and fully coupled to a finite volume Godunov-type shock-capturing shallow water model, to directly simulate the highly transient flood waves through hydraulic structures. Different coupling approaches, i.e., flux term coupling and source term coupling, are implemented and compared. A numerical experiment conducted for an analytical dam-break test indicates that the flux term coupling approach may lead to more accurate results, with the calculated RMSE against water level 28%–38% less than that produced by the source term coupling approach. The flux term coupling approach is therefore adopted to improve the current urban flood model, and it is further tested by reproducing the laboratory experiments of flood routing in a flume with partially open sluice gates, conducted in the hydraulic laboratory at the Zhejiang Institute of Hydraulics and Estuary, China. The numerical results are compared favorably with experimental measurements, with a maximum RMSE of 0.0851 for all the individual tests. The satisfactory results demonstrate that the flood model implemented with the flux coupling approach is able to accurately simulate the flow through hydraulic structures, with enhanced predictive capability for urban flood modeling.

Highlights

  • IntroductionDue to climate change and rapid urbanization, extreme floods have been observed to happen more frequently and severely, threatening human lives and causing significant damage to properties [1]

  • Due to climate change and rapid urbanization, extreme floods have been observed to happen more frequently and severely, threatening human lives and causing significant damage to properties [1].For example, a flash flood caused by an intense rainfall event led to 79 deaths and 1.86 billion USD of economic loss in Beijing, China in July 2012 [2]

  • For urban flood modeling and prediction, representing flow dynamics and inundation processes in sufficient detail is important for reliable risk assessment and emergency planning [17,18]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Due to climate change and rapid urbanization, extreme floods have been observed to happen more frequently and severely, threatening human lives and causing significant damage to properties [1]. It is necessary to develop reliable approaches to represent sluice gates and other hydraulic structures in flood modeling. For urban flood modeling and prediction, representing flow dynamics and inundation processes in sufficient detail is important for reliable risk assessment and emergency planning [17,18]. Most of the existing approaches and models provide simplified representation of the complex hydraulic boundary conditions resulting from the operation of gate structures [27,28], which may not be adequate to reflect realistic flow dynamics. Most of these modeling approaches require excessive model calibration to specify parameter values and are not transferable to different study sites. Simulation results from the two models are compared to recommend a more accurate approach for wider urban flood modeling

Finite Volume Godunov-Type SWE Model
Gate Model
Flow through a sluice gate:
Flux Term Coupling Approach
Flux Term Coupling
Source Term Coupling Approach
Analytical Tests
The RMSE resulting from the flux term defined inwas
Flume Experiments
Comparison
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.