Abstract
A simple pharmacophore point filter has been developed that discriminates between drug-like and nondrug-like chemical matter. It is based on the observation that nondrugs are often underfunctionalized. Therefore, a minimum count of well-defined pharmacophore points is required to pass the filter. The application of the filter results in 66-69% of subsets of the MDDR database to be classified as drug-like. Furthermore, 61-68% of subsets of the CMC database are classified as drug-like. In contrast, only 36% of the ACD are found to be drug-like. While these results are not quite as good as those obtained with recently described neural net approaches, the method used here has clear advantages. In contrast to a neural net approach and also in contrast to decision tree methods described recently, the pharmacophore filter has been developed by using "chemical wisdom" that is unbiased from fitting the structural content of specific drug databases to prediction models. Similar to decision tree methods, the pharmacophore point filter provides a detailed structural reason for the classification of each molecule as drug or nondrug. The pharmacophore point filter results are compared to neural net filter results. A statistically significant overlap between compounds recognized as drug-like validates both approaches. The pharmacophore point filter complements neural net approaches as well as property profiling approaches used as drug-likeness filters in compound library analysis and design.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.