Simple, low-tech option for carbon sequestration

Abstract

The August 2012 issue of Physics Today (page 22) contains an item by David Kramer that discusses problems associated with present carbon capture and storage technologies that use geologic sequestration. Several high-tech methods for carbon sequestration are being developed, but one low-tech method is as simple as disposing of discarded wood by burying it rather than burning it. Wood is approximately 50% carbon, and when it decomposes or burns, the temporarily sequestered carbon is returned to the atmosphere. Planting trees can help, but new forests act as carbon sinks only until the rate of decay of the wood catches up to the rate of growth. As a complement to the present scientific and engineering efforts, encouraging communities to “bury, don’t burn” discarded wood could be a relatively cheap and easy way to sequester carbon.Nothing is more low tech than digging a hole, and in landfills that are simply covered with soil, 0–3% of the carbon from wood is released as carbon dioxide and methane after several decades, with the remaining carbon mostly stored as a long-term nonreactive solid mass. In landfills designed to remain dry, methane release is negligible, and the wood doesn’t decompose.11. J. A. Micales, K. E. Skog, Int. Biodeter. Biodegr 39, 145 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-8305(97)83389-6,22. J. Bogner, K. Spokas, in Soils and Global Change, R. Lal et al., eds., Lewis/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (1995), p. 67. Globally, the emission rate from fossil-fuel consumption is about 8 gigatons of carbon per year (GtC/yr), with an accumulated load of about 165 GtC in the atmosphere. An uptake of 60 GtC/yr, including an estimated 10 GtC/yr from large pieces of dead wood, is temporarily sequestered by land vegetation. Municipally collected waste (old furniture, construction waste, cleared brush, and so forth) is estimated at 1 GtC/yr, although the percentage presently burned is unknown.33. N. Zeng, Carbon Balance Manage 3, 1 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-3-1REFERENCESSection:ChooseTop of pageREFERENCES <<1. J. A. Micales, K. E. Skog, Int. Biodeter. Biodegr 39, 145 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-8305(97)83389-6, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI2. J. Bogner, K. Spokas, in Soils and Global Change, R. Lal et al., eds., Lewis/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (1995), p. 67. Google Scholar3. N. Zeng, Carbon Balance Manage 3, 1 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-3-1, Google ScholarCrossref© 2013 American Institute of Physics.