Abstract
Using the concept of ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable) and the Expected Utility Theory (EUT), this paper introduces a risk-based optimisation approach to the SIL (Safety Integrity Level) determination process. In the commonly used SIL determination methods the target SIL is determined by comparing the existing level of risk to a pre-set corporate risk target; the gap defines the level of risk that should be reduced by additional layers of protection, such as safety systems. Such methods do not directly factor in the cost impact of the allocated target SILs, nor do they examine the practicability of all SIL alternatives in reducing the risk to as low as possible. The method presented in this paper is based on assigning utility values to different SIL alternatives, in accordance with the cost and benefits of each alternative, and comparing the expected utility values in order to determine the optimum SIL rating as target. A numerical analysis has been developed and applied to the SIL evaluation for a gas turbine over-speed protection to demonstrate the advantages and challenges of the new method.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
