Significant Disagreement Between Conventional Parameters and 3D Echocardiography-Derived Ejection Fraction in the Detection of Right Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction and Its Association With Outcomes

Abstract

Conventional echocardiographic parameters such as tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), fractional area change (FAC), and free-wall longitudinal strain (FWLS) offer limited insights into the complexity of right ventricular (RV) systolic function, while 3D echocardiography-derived RV ejection fraction (RVEF) enables a comprehensive assessment. We investigated the discordance between TAPSE, FAC, FWLS, and RVEF in RV systolic function grading and associated outcomes. We analyzed two- and three-dimensional echocardiography data from 2 centers including 750 patients followed up for all-cause mortality. Right ventricular dysfunction was defined as RVEF <45%, with guideline-recommended thresholds (TAPSE <17mm, FAC <35%, FWLS >-20%) considered. Among patients with normal RVEF, significant proportions exhibited impaired TAPSE (21%), FAC (33%), or FWLS (8%). Conversely, numerous patients with reduced RVEF had normal TAPSE (46%), FAC (26%), or FWLS (41%). Using receiver-operating characteristic analysis, FWLS exhibited the highest area under the curve of discrimination for RV dysfunction (RVEF <45%) with 59% sensitivity and 92% specificity. Over a median 3.7-year follow-up, 15% of patients died. Univariable Cox regression identified TAPSE, FAC, FWLS, and RVEF as significant mortality predictors. Combining impaired conventional parameters showed that outcomes are the worst if at least 2 parameters are impaired and gradually better if only one or none of them are impaired (log-rank P<.005). Guideline-recommended cutoff values of conventional echocardiographic parameters of RV systolic function are only modestly associated with RVEF-based assessment. Impaired values of FWLS showed the closest association with the RVEF cutoff. Our results emphasize a multiparametric approach in the assessment of RV function, especially if 3D echocardiography is not available.