Abstract

Background Metaplastic thymoma (MT) is a very uncommon thymoma type, with biphasic differentiation as one of its histological characteristics. This histological pattern, however, can also be mistaken for type A thymoma and the A component in type AB thymoma. Methods Postoperative specimens were collected from five MT and four type A thymomas with a retrospective analysis involving immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and next-generation sequencing (NGS). Results The histological morphology of the MT overlapped with that of the type A thymoma. With immunostains, the former’s spindle cell components expressed vimentin and EMA, but not CD20. In MT, 3/5 cases had the nuclear expression of YAP1. The spindle cell component of the type A thymoma was found to express CD20. In all five cases of MT, FISH detection revealed YAP1–MAML2 fusion, which was not found in any type A thymoma cases. NGS sequencing confirmed YAP1–MAML2 rearrangement in all five cases of MT, and mutations in POLE and HRAS were also found in two cases, respectively. GTF2I c.74146970 T > A mutations were found in all cases of type A thymoma, and HRAS and NRAS mutations were found in two cases, but no YAP1–MAML2 rearrangement was evident. Conclusions For the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of challenging cases, the YAP1–MAML2 rearrangement and GTF2I mutation were both significant molecular events specific to MT and type A thymoma, respectively.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call