Abstract
AbstractBecause downscaling methods can yield substantially different projections of future climate, it is imperative to constrain these projections with information from existing observations, while also recognizing observational uncertainty. California is a natural test case to develop observational constraints on future projections given prior studies that have purportedly found contrasting spatial patterns in late‐20th‐century trends of summertime daily‐maximum temperature: cooling along the coast and warming inland. Revisiting this claim, we find that coastal cooling is largely confined to non‐homogenized temperature records while homogenized observations show either non‐significant cooling or warming trends throughout the state. This finding has implications for weighting historical and future climate simulations downscaled using localized constructed analogs. Failure to consider out‐of‐sample skill results in weighted and unweighted Representative Concentration Pathway 8.5 temperature trend estimates differing by 2 K/century or more in California. However, weighted mean estimates that properly account for trend uncertainty do not differ significantly from the unweighted mean.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call