Abstract
Results of medical research studies are often contradictory or cannot be reproduced. One reason is that there may not be enough patient subjects available for observation for a long enough time period. Another reason is that patient populations may vary considerably with respect to geographic and demographic boundaries thus limiting how broadly the results apply. Even when similar patient populations are pooled together from multiple locations, differences in medical treatment and record systems can limit which outcome measures can be commonly analyzed. In total, these differences in medical research settings can lead to differing conclusions or can even prevent some studies from starting. We thus sought to create a patient research system that could aggregate as many patient observations as possible from a large number of hospitals in a uniform way. We call this system the ‘Shared Health Research Information Network’, with the following properties: (1) reuse electronic health data from everyday clinical care for research purposes, (2) respect patient privacy and hospital autonomy, (3) aggregate patient populations across many hospitals to achieve statistically significant sample sizes that can be validated independently of a single research setting, (4) harmonize the observation facts recorded at each institution such that queries can be made across many hospitals in parallel, (5) scale to regional and national collaborations. The purpose of this report is to provide open source software for multi-site clinical studies and to report on early uses of this application. At this time SHRINE implementations have been used for multi-site studies of autism co-morbidity, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, peripartum cardiomyopathy, colorectal cancer, diabetes, and others. The wide range of study objectives and growing adoption suggest that SHRINE may be applicable beyond the research uses and participating hospitals named in this report.
Highlights
Results of medical research studies are often contradictory[1,2] or cannot be reproduced[3,4,5,6,7]
We sought to create a patient research system that could aggregate as many patient observations as possible from as many hospitals as possible. We call this system the ‘Shared Health Research Information Network’, with the following properties: (1) reuse electronic health data from everyday clinical care for research purposes; (2) respect patient privacy and hospital autonomy; (3) aggregate patient populations across many hospitals to achieve statistically significant sample sizes that can be validated independently of a single research setting; (4) harmonize the observation facts recorded at each institution such that queries can be made across many hospitals in parallel; (5) scale to regional and national collaborations
3 independent academic medical centers have utilized SHRINE for an evaluation study focused on Type II Diabetes[26]
Summary
Results of medical research studies are often contradictory[1,2] or cannot be reproduced[3,4,5,6,7]. One reason is that there may not be enough available patient subjects[8] observed over a long enough time period[9,10] Another reason is that patient populations may vary considerably across geographic[11] and demographic boundaries[12] limiting how broadly the results apply. Even when similar patient populations are pooled together from multiple locations, differences in medical treatment[13] and record systems[14,15] can limit which outcome measures can be commonly analyzed. These differences in medical research settings can lead to differing conclusions or can even prevent some studies from starting. Even for a disease reaching epidemic levels it is often necessary to observe multiple health care systems in parallel to study enough patients representing the general population
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call