Should We Distinguish Between Periventricular and Deep White Matter Hyperintensities?

Abstract

To the Editor: The recent article by DeCarli et al1 addresses a somewhat neglected aspect of white matter hyperintensities (WMH), the significance of their anatomical location. The authors argue that the commonly accepted categorization into deep (DWMH) and periventricular (PVWMH) WMH is arbitrary, because the 2 are very highly correlated, and a spatial analysis does not reveal distinct populations. We think that this conclusion is premature, because the categorization depends on a number of factors. The first limitation of their analysis is that they examined individuals in their 70s who presented to a specialty clinic, suggesting that the white matter lesions in their sample were at an advanced stage. If an analogy is drawn from cerebral atrophy in dementia, regional differences in atrophy that are present in the different subtypes of dementia become less prominent in the later stages. In our study of WMH in middle age (60 to 64 years), the correlation of DWMH and PVWMH was much lower ( r =0.621; …