Should primary care physicians consult on their admitted patients? A single-center survey study

Abstract

Background With the rise of hospital medicine, care has become fragmented between inpatient and outpatient settings. Having primary care physicians (PCPs) consult on their admitted patients through televisits could improve patient and hospital outcomes, but perspectives on this model are unknown in adult hospital medicine. Methods A single-center cross-sectional survey was conducted to compare PCP and hospitalist attitudes regarding PCP telemedicine consultation for admitted patients in a large US academic hospital. Results A total of 120 participants (52 hospitalists and 68 PCPs) responded to the survey. Most hospitalists believed that their patients would benefit from PCP consultation, with 45.8% believing it was slightly important, 18.8% moderately important, and 22.9% quite important. The level of importance did not seem to influence the effort required, as most hospitalists would put in only a little effort (35.4%) to obtain a PCP consultation. PCPs were more inclined to consult on their admitted patients; 18.6% considered it slightly important to obtain their consultation, 35.6% believed it was moderately important, and 23.7% believed it was quite important. PCPs were willing to put more effort into setting up a PCP consultation (some effort, 45.8%) vs hospitalists (little effort, 35.4%). The most common challenge perceived by both groups was time commitment (hospitalists, 78.8%; PCPs, 75.0%). Conclusions Both hospitalists and PCPs agree that a PCP consultation would benefit the patient’s medical care in specific situations. However, views on the importance and frequency of PCP consultations vary between the two groups.