Should patients with hypertension be screened for psychological distress?

Abstract

To determine whether fresh embryo transfers are at a higher risk of abnormal implantation compared with frozen embryo transfers while accounting for the embryo stage at transfer.Retrospective cohort study.Not applicable.We used data from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies to identify all fresh and frozen autologous IVF cycles from 2004-2013 resulting in a positive pregnancy test. The cycles were parameterized into a four-level predictor of [1] fresh blastocyst transfer, [2] fresh non-blastocyst transfer, [3] frozen blastocyst transfer, and [4] frozen non-blastocyst transfer.None.We examined a composite outcome of abnormal implantation, defined as biochemical pregnancy, ectopic/heterotopic pregnancy, and first-trimester pregnancy loss. Regression modeling was performed with repeated measures multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for age, parity, number of embryos transferred, infertility diagnosis, and calendar year of treatment.Of 509,938 cycles analyzed, 31.8% resulted in abnormal implantation. Compared with a fresh blastocyst transfer, a fresh non-blastocyst transfer had a 22% increase risk of abnormal implantation, a frozen blastocyst transfer had a 36% increase risk, and a frozen non-blastocyst transfer had a 57% increase risk. When individual outcomes were analyzed, fresh embryo transfers had a lower risk of biochemical pregnancy and pregnancy loss but a higher risk for ectopic/heterotopic pregnancy.Fresh blastocyst transfers had the lowest overall risk of abnormal implantation but a higher risk of ectopic/heterotopic pregnancy. Although embryo cryopreservation is indicated in certain treatment cycles, elective embryo cryopreservation may not be the optimal strategy to adopt for all cycles.