Abstract

Veganism, where adherents eschew the consumption of animals or their by-products, has seen a substantial increase in popularity in recent years. Vegans who follow the diet for moral or ethical reasons (ethical vegans) have argued in the United States, with limited success and, more recently, in the United Kingdom that they should be protected from discrimination on the grounds of their adherence to ethical veganism, contending that ethical veganism should be subject to similar protections as religion. In the United Kingdom, anti-discrimination legislation protects philosophical beliefs in addition to religion and it was recently held in a preliminary hearing in Casamitjana v The League Against Cruel Sports that ethical veganism falls within the ambit of the relevant statute. The authors examine the situation in the United Kingdom and the United States and conclude that, given that Australian anti-discrimination statutes only refer to religion as a protected attribute, this outcome is unlikely to be replicated since veganism is highly unlikely to meet the current definition of religion.

Highlights

  • Veganism has been variously described as a lifestyle, a dietary preference and a social philosophy[1] but it does not generally fit into what most people would regard as a religion

  • It is doubtful that this outcome would be replicated in Australia, as the anti-discrimination statutes only refer to religion as a protected attribute, and veganism is extremely unlikely to fall within the current definition of religion

  • The final component was held to be met with Employment Judge Postle noting that ethical veganism ‘carries with it an important moral essential’, which is ‘founded upon a long-standing tradition recognising the moral consequences of non-human animal sentience’

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Veganism has been variously described as a lifestyle, a dietary preference and a social philosophy[1] but it does not generally fit into what most people would regard as a religion. Vegans who follow the diet for moral or ethical reasons (‘ethical vegans’), have argued in the United States (‘US’) and, more recently, in the United Kingdom (‘UK’) that they should be protected from discrimination on the grounds of their adherence to veganism. They contend that ethical veganism should be subject to similar protections as religion.

18 Victoria University Law and Justice Journal
Veganism
The Casamitjana Case
Is Veganism a Religion?
A United States
B Australia
D iscussion
Findings
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.