Abstract

Abstract. The tools for interpreting fission-track data are evolving apace, but, even so, the outcomes cannot be better than the data. Recent studies showed that track etching and observation affect confined-track length measurements. We investigated the effects of grain orientation, polishing, etching and observation on fission-track counts in apatite. Our findings throw light on the phenomena that affect the track counts and hence the sample ages, whilst raising the question: what counts as an etched surface track? This is pertinent to manual and automatic track counts and to designing training strategies for neural networks. Counting prism faces and using the ζ calibration for age calculation are assumed to deal with most etching- and counting-related factors. However, prism faces are not unproblematic for counting, and other surface orientations are not unusable. Our results suggest that a reinvestigation of the etching properties of different apatite faces could increase the range useful for dating and lift a significant restriction for provenance studies.

Highlights

  • Fission-track dating and temperature–time path modeling are much used thermochronological tools for geological research

  • We submit this contribution from a concern that, while the tools for interpreting fission-track data are evolving, the calculated ages, age components and thermal histories are only as good as the track counts and the measured track lengths

  • Recent studies that have taken up the twin issues of etching and observation confirm that both have an effect on confined-track lengths (Jonckheere et al, 2007, 2017; Tamer et al, 2019; Tamer and Ketcham, 2020; Aslanian et al, 2021; Ketcham and Tamer, 2021)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fission-track dating and temperature–time path modeling are much used thermochronological tools for geological research. The fission-track method rests on counting and measuring the lattice damage trails caused by uranium fission. Latent fission tracks in apatite are ∼ 20 μm long (Bhandari et al, 1971; Jonckheere, 2003) and ∼ 10 nm wide (Paul and Fitzgerald, 1992; Paul, 1993; Li et al, 2011, 2012, 2014), too thin to observe with an optical microscope. The polished grain mounts are etched to make them visible. It is often taken for granted that factors related to etching and counting are inconsequential, e.g., that counting losses

Experiments and results
Findings
Discussion and conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.