Short Cervix Following Initial Cerclage-Reinforcing Cerclage Versus Expectant Management

Abstract

ObjectivesTo determine whether reinforcing cerclage following ultrasound evidence of cerclage failure before 24 weeks is an effective method to delay gestational age at delivery, and to decrease the rate of preterm and peri-viable delivery. MethodsA retrospective review was conducted for all patients who underwent any cervical cerclage procedure at a single tertiary care centre in Toronto, Canada between 1 December 2007 and 31 December 2017. ResultsOf 1482 cerclage procedures completed during the study period, 40 pregnant persons who underwent reinforcing cerclage were compared with 40 pregnant persons who were found to have cerclage failure before 24 weeks but were managed expectantly. After adjusting for the shortest cervical length measured prior to 24 weeks, there was no significant difference between the reinforcing cerclage and control group for gestational age at delivery, preterm, or peri-viable birth (P = 0.52, P = 0.54, P = 0.74, respectively). In an unadjusted model, there was a statistically significant increase in placental infection identified on postpartum placenta pathology in the reinforcing cerclage group compared with the expectant management group, 92.9% compared with 66.7% (P = 0.028). ConclusionReinforcing cerclage is unlikely to successfully delay the gestational age at delivery and reduce rates of preterm and pre-viable birth, especially if irreversible and progressive cervical change has begun. Future work should examine the role of preoperative amniocentesis to explore the impact of pre-existing intra-amniotic infection and reinforcing cerclage success.