Abstract

BackgroundFuel treatments are widely used to alter fuels in forested ecosystems to mitigate wildfire behavior and effects. However, few studies have examined long-term ecological effects of interacting fuel treatments (commercial harvests, pre-commercial thinnings, pile and burning, and prescribed fire) and wildfire. Using annually fitted Landsat satellite-derived Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR) curves and paired pre-fire treated and untreated field sites, we tested changes in the differenced NBR (dNBR) and years since treatment as predictors of biophysical attributes one and nine years after the 2007 Egley Fire Complex in Oregon, USA. We also assessed short- and long-term fuel treatment impacts on field-measured attributes one and nine years post fire.ResultsOne-year post-fire burn severity (dNBR) was lower in treated than in untreated sites across the Egley Fire Complex. Annual NBR trends showed that treated sites nearly recovered to pre-fire values four years post fire, while untreated sites had a slower recovery rate. Time since treatment and dNBR significantly predicted tree canopy and understory green vegetation cover in 2008, suggesting that tree canopy and understory vegetation cover increased in areas that were treated recently pre fire. Live tree density was more affected by severity than by pre-fire treatment in either year, as was dead tree density one year post fire. In 2008, neither treatment nor severity affected percent cover of functional groups (shrub, graminoid, forb, invasive, and moss–lichen–fungi); however, by 2016, shrub, graminoid, forb, and invasive cover were higher in high-severity burn sites than in low-severity burn sites. Total fuel loads nine years post fire were higher in untreated, high-severity burn sites than any other sites. Tree canopy cover and density of trees, saplings, and seedlings were lower nine years post fire than one year post fire across treatments and severity, whereas live and dead tree basal area, understory surface cover, and fuel loads increased.ConclusionsPre-fire fuel treatments effectively lowered the occurrence of high-severity wildfire, likely due to successful pre-fire tree and sapling density and surface fuels reduction. This study also quantified the changes in vegetation and fuels from one to nine years post fire. We suggest that low-severity wildfire can meet prescribed fire management objectives of lowering surface fuel accumulations while not increasing overstory tree mortality.

Highlights

  • Fuel treatments are widely used to alter fuels in forested ecosystems to mitigate wildfire behavior and effects

  • Landscape-level summary of treatment effects on burn severity The Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity (MTBS)-based differenced NBR (dNBR) classification of burn severity summarized across the entire Egley Fire Complex showed that 26.7% (6085 ha) of untreated lands (23 226 ha) burned with high severity, whereas only 12.9% (2150 ha) of treated lands (19 233 ha) burned with high severity (Fig. 3a and b)

  • The complete landscape analysis of the Egley Fire Complex showed that the proportion of treated areas that burned at high severity increased with time since treatment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fuel treatments are widely used to alter fuels in forested ecosystems to mitigate wildfire behavior and effects. Lawson) forests in the western United States frequently experienced natural thinning due to lowseverity surface fires prior to Euro-American settlement (Cooper 1960; Allen et al 2002; Agee and Skinner 2005). Many established seedlings and saplings were often killed by low-severity surface fires, reducing fuel buildups (Bradley et al 1992), but heat from the low-intensity flames rarely penetrated the thick bark enough to kill larger ponderosa pine trees (Cooper 1960; McCune 1988). After Euro-American settlement, fire suppression efforts and change in land use, including grazing, logging, and road development, led to a decrease in lowseverity surface fires across much of the range of dry ponderosa pine (Covington and Moore 1994; Allen et al 2002; Hessburg et al 2005). Many dry ponderosa pine forests have experienced a decrease in fire resilience, defined as an ecosystem’s ability to recover to pre-fire state after a disturbance (Holling 1973; Groffman et al 2006)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call