Abstract

This paper aims to coordinate a shipment lead time hedging (SLTH) problem between a building contractor and a logistics provider in the prefabricated construction supply chain (PCSC). In the PCSC, untimely (early or late) delivery of prefabs will result in project time and cost overrun. To mitigate this challenge, the building contractor requires the logistics provider to reduce the shipping time variability, which is termed the SLTH strategy. Though it benefits the building contractor, this strategy puts more investment and operational pressures on the logistics provider. To solve this conflict, a coordination mechanism is introduced. Two terms are involved in this mechanism: an SLTH level related cost term is charged by the logistic provider to the building contractor and a constant transfer term is adopted to fairly allocate the system surplus. Three decentralized models are investigated: i.e. two Stackelberg game models with alternative decision-making sequences and an equal power model. Further comparative analysis and numerical studies reveal that the proposed coordination mechanism increases the SLTH level and ensures a win-win situation. Moreover, some interesting managerial implications are derived.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call