Abstract
Anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD) is an organic amendment-based management practice for controlling soil-borne plant pathogens. Pathogen suppression appears to be carbon source-dependent and mediated by bacteria that proliferate and produce volatile organic compounds, as well as physico-chemical changes (i.e., elevated temperature, lowered redox potential and pH, release of metal ions) in soil. ASD is under study for adoption in tree crops as a replacement for chemical-fumigation, but its widespread use is limited by incomplete understanding of its suppression mechanisms and high economic costs. The carbon substrate is one component of the ASD process that can be optimized to enhance effectiveness and affordability. While rice bran is currently the standard carbon source used for ASD, we identified three alternative substrates (molasses, mustard seed meal, and tomato pomace) that are similar in efficacy to rice bran at generating and sustaining soil anoxia and reducing populations of introduced plant pathogens. Here, we used replicated ASD field trials to determine if rice bran and the alternative carbon substrates would elicit similar soil bacterial communities (characterized via amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene v4 region) and to assess if any observed community shifts were consistent across repeated trials. We found significant, but minimal differences in community composition between ASD carbon treatments (F4,30 = 2.80, P 5 log2 fold change) in all ASD treatments compared to untreated controls. A group of shared core genera belonging to the Clostridiales and Selenomonadales were identified in both trials and constituted 22.6% and 21.5% of the communities. Bacterial taxa that were most responsive to ASD treatments had the genomic potential for denitrification, nitrogen fixation, and fermentation reactions that produce organic acids (such as acetate and butyrate) known to inhibit in vitro growth of plant pathogens based on predicted metagenomes. Together, these results indicate that reproducible and effective implementation of ASD is achievable with alternative carbon substrates to rice bran.
Highlights
Pre-plant soil fumigation using chemicals, such as methyl bromide, methyl iodide, 1,3-dichloropropene, and chloropicrin has been an important tool for the management of soil-borne plant pathogens (Duniway, 2002; Hanson et al, 2013)
In Trial 1, rice bran (RB) and MTP communities were significantly less diverse than no treatment controls (NTC) communities, which had the highest number of amplicon sequence variants (ASVs)
molasses derived from sugar beets (MOL) communities had the highest number of ASVs, but were only significantly different from the treatments with the lowest number of ASVs (RB and mustard seed meal (MSM))
Summary
Pre-plant soil fumigation using chemicals, such as methyl bromide, methyl iodide, 1,3-dichloropropene, and chloropicrin has been an important tool for the management of soil-borne plant pathogens (Duniway, 2002; Hanson et al, 2013). The near complete phase-out of methyl bromide (https://www.epa.gov/ods-phaseout/methyl-bromide) combined with the concerns listed above for all soil fumigants has prompted development of alternative strategies to manage soil-borne plant pathogens (Martin, 2003; Schneider et al, 2003). ASD is used commercially as a pre-plant soil treatment for strawberry production and rice cultivation (Momma et al, 2013; Shennan et al, 2014, 2018) and is under active development for use in many cropping systems including various vegetables (Butler et al, 2014), apples (Hewavitharana et al, 2014; Hewavitharana and Mazzola, 2016), walnuts (Strauss and Kluepfel, 2015; Strauss et al, 2017), and almonds (Browne et al, 2018). Widespread implementation of ASD is currently limited by incomplete knowledge of its mode of action and the need for optimization across a variety of crops and soil types (Strauss and Kluepfel, 2015; Shrestha et al, 2016)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.