Abstract
This study aims to analyze Sharia banking dispute settlements in Religious Courts regarding Sharia compliance and state regulations. The data is collected from the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia website on Profit Sharing (PLS) financing, musyarakah, and non-profit Sharing (non-PLS) financing, murabahah. It is legal empirical research with a comparative approach. The results of this study indicate that Sharia banking disputes occur partly because there are still legal loopholes due to the general nature of the existing rules leading to multiple interpretations. The disputes are contributed mainly by default and unlawful acts. There are differences in the judge's decisions in the two case studies related to the fulfillment of legal principles in the form of benefits, justice, and legal certainty in the decisions made. Regarding the suitability of the contract, in the murabahah case, the pillars and conditions have been fulfilled, but there are other things that damage the contract. There has been an urgent need to strengthen regulations related to more detailed financing contracts. The regulators should promote an Islamic banking regulatory framework that guarantees legal certainty for both parties, the customers and Islamic financial institutions, as well as provide a stronger legal basis for dispute settlements.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
