Abstract

Abstract. Lunar topographic information, e.g., lunar DEM (Digital Elevation Model), is very important for lunar exploration missions and scientific research. Lunar DEMs are typically generated from photogrammetric image processing or laser altimetry, of which photogrammetric methods require multiple stereo images of an area. DEMs generated from these methods are usually achieved by various interpolation techniques, leading to interpolation artifacts in the resulting DEM. On the other hand, photometric shape reconstruction, e.g., SfS (Shape from Shading), extensively studied in the field of Computer Vision has been introduced to pixel-level resolution DEM refinement. SfS methods have the ability to reconstruct pixel-wise terrain details that explain a given image of the terrain. If the terrain and its corresponding pixel-wise albedo were to be estimated simultaneously, this is a SAfS (Shape and Albedo from Shading) problem and it will be under-determined without additional information. Previous works show strong statistical regularities in albedo of natural objects, and this is even more logically valid in the case of lunar surface due to its lower surface albedo complexity than the Earth. In this paper we suggest a method that refines a lower-resolution DEM to pixel-level resolution given a monocular image of the coverage with known light source, at the same time we also estimate the corresponding pixel-wise albedo map. We regulate the behaviour of albedo and shape such that the optimized terrain and albedo are the likely solutions that explain the corresponding image. The parameters in the approach are optimized through a kernel-based relaxation framework to gain computational advantages. In this research we experimentally employ the Lunar-Lambertian model for reflectance modelling; the framework of the algorithm is expected to be independent of a specific reflectance model. Experiments are carried out using the monocular images from Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) Narrow Angle Camera (NAC) (0.5 m spatial resolution), constrained by the SELENE and LRO Elevation Model (SLDEM 2015) of 60 m spatial resolution. The results indicate that local details are largely recovered by the algorithm while low frequency topographic consistency is affected by the low-resolution DEM.

Highlights

  • Lunar DEMs are mainly obtained from stereo photogrammetry or laser altimetry

  • We noticed that the refined albedo map to some extent contains topographic details and slight shades, which implies that a small extent of topographic detail is suppressed by shape constraints and is eventually attributed to the albedo

  • The profile comparison presents a shape that deviates from the Narrow Angle Camera (NAC) DEM, especially in Figure 6a where the depth of the crater in the refined DEM is around 10 m shallower than its counterpart in the NAC DEM

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Lunar DEMs are mainly obtained from stereo photogrammetry or laser altimetry. Stereo photogrammetric processing requires coverage of a target area with stereo images and is able to produce DEMs with best resolutions of about three times of the image resolution. Laser altimetry such as the Lunar Orbiter Laser Altimeter (LOLA) (Smith et al, 2010) produces global and highly reliable topographic information of the target body (i.e. the Moon) for various scientific purposes It is characterized by its large sample spacing, resulting in low resolution DEMs (e.g. 1024 pixel-per-degree for LOLA DEMs), and utilizing the derived topographic products for high resolution purposes may introduce significant interpolation artifacts and limiting its applications. In this paper a method is described that refines an existing low resolution DEM (either from laser altimetry data or stereo photogrammetry) to image pixel-level resolution by reflectancebased surface reconstruction techniques (i.e. Shape and albedo from shading, SAfS) utilizing one single image.

Framework of the approach
Fundamentals of reflectance-based surface reconstruction
Locally varying albedo
Optimization
Datasets
Experimental results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call