Abstract

Landslide susceptibility mapping is well recognized as an essential element in supporting decision-making activities for preventing and mitigating landslide hazards as it provides information regarding locations where landslides are most likely to occur. The main purpose of this study is to produce a landslide susceptibility map of Mt. Umyeon in Korea using an artificial neural network (ANN) involving the factor selection method and various non-linear activation functions. A total of 151 historical landslide events and 20 predisposing factors consisting of Geographic Information System (GIS)-based morphological, hydrological, geological, and land cover datasets were constructed with a resolution of 5 x 5 m. The collected datasets were applied to information gain ratio analysis to confirm the predictive power and multicollinearity diagnosis to ensure the correlation of independence among the landslide predisposing factors. The best 11 predisposing factors that were selected in this study were randomly divided into a 70:30 ratio for training and validation datasets, which were used to produce ANN-based landslide susceptibility models. The ANN model used in this study had a multi-layer perceptron (MLP) structure consisting of an input layer, one hidden layer, and an output layer. In the output layer, the logistic sigmoid function was used to represent the result value within the range of 0 to 1, and six non-linear activation functions were used for the hidden layer. The performance of the landslide susceptibility models was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve, Kappa index, and five statistical indices (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV)) with the training dataset. In addition, the landslide susceptibility models were validated using the aforementioned measures with the validation dataset and were compared using the Friedman test to check the significant differences among the six developed models. The optimal number of neurons was determined based on the aforementioned performance evaluation and validation results. Overall, the model with the best performance was the MLP model with the logistic sigmoid activation function in the output layer and the hyperbolic tangent sigmoid activation function with five neurons in the hidden layer. The validation results of the best model showed a sensitivity of 82.61%, specificity of 78.26%, accuracy of 80.43%, PPV of 79.17%, NPV of 81.82%, a Kappa index of 0.609, and AUC of 0.879. The results of this study highlight the effectiveness of selecting an optimal MLP model structure for shallow landslide susceptibility mapping using an appropriate predisposing factor section method.

Highlights

  • Shallow landslides are one of the most common and frequent geo-disasters that occur in mountainous regions [1]

  • The first important step in developing a landslide susceptibility map involves building a reliable database of input–output pairs as it can control the performance of the susceptibility model

  • This study demonstrates the systematic procedure of determining the optimal structure of an artificial neural network (ANN)-based landslide susceptibility model for identifying landslide-prone areas in Mount Umyoen, Korea

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Shallow landslides are one of the most common and frequent geo-disasters that occur in mountainous regions [1]. The annual rainfall in the central region of Korea is approximately 1200–1500 mm, and more than half of the annual precipitation is concentrated during the months from July to September due to the influence of the Monsoon season. Due to these topographical and climate conditions, Korean mountains are regarded as regions that are susceptible to shallow landslides [3,4]. According to the statistics of the Korea Forest Service from 1976 to 2018, an average of 34 casualties and 395 ha of landslides occur annually. Considering such figures, there is a growing national interest in the development of proactive technologies for the prevention and mitigation of landslide hazards

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call