Shall not be infringed: how the NRA used religious language to transform the meaning of the Second Amendment

Jessica Dawson

doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0276-z

Abstract

Understanding the deep meaning of the Second Amendment is critical to understanding American gun culture. The centrality of the Second Amendment in American culture can be better understood through the intersection of American nationalism with Protestant Christianity. This paper argues that the National Rifle Association (NRA) has capitalized on the religious nationalism that arose in the late 1970s alongside the Moral Majority and has increasingly used religious language to shape the discourse surrounding the Second Amendment. Understanding the transformation of the Second Amendment from an important Constitutional amendment to an article of faith in religious nationalism provides new insight about the meaning of guns for American identity. The use of religious rhetoric, such as references to evil combined with references to civic obligation, illustrates the merging of American civic religion with the New Christian Right’s rhetoric. Using issues of the American Rifleman to investigate the changing discourse since the mid-1970s, this paper demonstrates how the NRA increased its use of religious language to frame the political debate about gun rights through a religious nationalist lens.

Highlights

Second Amendment and religious nationalismPerhaps no other subject in America engenders the level of controversy and intensity of emotions as the Second Amendment
I explore the National Rifle Association’s (NRA) use of religious language to increasingly frame the political debate about gun rights through a religious nationalist lens
An examination of the American Rifleman presents an opportunity to study the current emergence of religious nationalism in America, primarily because it is targeted toward broad NRA membership, rather than at core Second Amendment supporters like other NRA magazines (Melzer, 2012)

Summary

Introduction

Has capitalized on the religious nationalism that arose in the late 1970s with the rise of the Moral Majority and the New Christian Right (Wuthnow, 1990) and has increasingly used religious language to shape the discourse surrounding the Second Amendment. In the context of religious nationalism, the Second Amendment serves as a means to protect the right to engage in violence (Gorski and TürkmenDervişoğlu, 2013; Obert, 2018).

Results

Conclusion