Abstract

A major challenge for studying the role of sexual selection in divergence and speciation is understanding the relative influence of different sexually selected signals on those processes in both intra- and interspecific contexts. Different signals may be more or less susceptible to co-option for species identification depending on the balance of sexual and ecological selection acting upon them. To examine this, we tested three predictions to explain geographic variation in long- versus short-range sexual signals across a 3,500+km transect of two related Australian field cricket species (Teleogryllus spp.): (a) selection for species recognition, (b) environmental adaptation and (c) stochastic divergence. We measured male calling song and male and female cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) in offspring derived from wild populations, reared under common garden conditions. Song clearly differentiated the species, and no hybrids were observed suggesting that hybridization is rare or absent. Spatial variation in song was not predicted by geography, genetics or climatic factors in either species. In contrast, CHC divergence was strongly associated with an environmental gradient supporting the idea that the climatic environment selects more directly upon these chemical signals. In light of recently advocated models of diversification via ecological selection on secondary sexual traits, the different environmental associations we found for song and CHCs suggest that the impact of ecological selection on population divergence, and how that influences speciation, might be different for acoustic versus chemical signals.

Highlights

  • Animals detect, recognize and respond to potential mating partners using a wide range of preferences and communication signals: their mate recognition system (MRS) (Greenfield, 2002)

  • Comparing calling song between allopatric and sympatric populations of T. oceanicus, we found no overall differences (MANOVA using the origin of individuals as a factor: Principal components (PCs), Wilks λ = 0.99, F1,129 = 0.355, p = .84)

  • Comparing cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) between allopatry and sympatry for T. oceanicus, we found that males but not females differed in their CHC profiles (MANOVA PCs: male CHCs F1,223 = 5.894, p < .001; female CHCs F1,130 = 0.481, p = .696)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recognize and respond to potential mating partners using a wide range of preferences and communication signals: their mate recognition system (MRS) (Greenfield, 2002). Sexual signals might vary due to different balances of sexual selection and various forms of natural selection (Blows, 2002; Endler, 1992; Kirkpatrick, 1982; Lande, 1981; Wilkins, Seddon, & Safran, 2013) The former has received much interest, and drift can enhance sexual selection's role in divergence by causing the MRSs of isolated populations to stochastically diverge to different trait optima (Kirkpatrick, 1982; Lande, 1981; Pascoal, Mendrok, Wilson, Hunt, & Bailey, 2017; Uyeda, Arnold, Hohenlohe, & Mead, 2009). Population divergence driven primarily by sexual selection does not make an a priori prediction about the direction of change in an MRS, whereas ecological selection (or other forms of natural selection) superimposed upon this does predict strong associations with geographic or environmental variables (Ritchie, 2007)

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call