Abstract

ABSTRACTThis article seeks to understand policy change in the context of Singapore’s higher education system. It does so by applying Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Approach to two cases of policy entrepreneurship. In doing so, this article finds that while the efforts of the policy entrepreneur in one case had given rise to substantial policy change, the policy entrepreneur in the second case was not able to generate policy change due to an impartial coupling of streams. In highlighting impartial coupling, this article seeks to understand how policy change may sometimes not occur, despite the efforts of a policy entrepreneur.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.