Sex Differences in Proximal Thoracic Aortic Disease Pathology: A Call to Action

Abstract

Abstract Introduction/Objective Sex disparity is reported across all forms of cardiovascular diseases. Only few studies have focused on sex differences in thoracic aortic disease pathology. We aim to identify and understand sex differences in this patient group to bridge the knowledge gap and improve clinicopathologic outcomes. Methods/Case Report This is a retrospective analysis of 83 proximal thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection (TAAD) cases treated at a single quaternary care center in 2019. Chart review was done for demographics. Consensus criteria (Stone JR et al. Cardiovasc Pathol 2015; 24:267-78; Halushka MK et al. Cardiovasc Pathol 2016; 25:247-57) and a scoring system (Waters KM et al. Cardiovasc Pathol 2017; 30:6-11) were used for pathology reporting. Clinical correlation was also made. Pearson’s chi-square test was used for statistical analysis. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) 83 patients (61 male and 22 female) were retrieved. Overall thoracic aortopathy was higher among males, accounting for 73.4% of individuals with TAAD. In a subgroup analysis, there was no sex difference in dissection, aortic root involvement, and bicuspid aortic valve (p>0.05). Genetic aortopathy was more prevalent in females than males (27.2% vs 9.8%, p=0.04) alongside early age at first aortic event (median age: 31y vs 52y). Histopathologically, females had frequent translamellar mucoid extracellular matrix accumulation (45.4% vs 22.9%, p=0.04), extensive (54.5% vs 27.8%, p=0.02) and severe (59% vs 34.4%, p=0.04) elastic fiber fragmentation, higher band like (9% vs 6.5%, p>0.05) plus extensive (13.6% vs 4.9%, p>0.05) smooth muscle nuclei loss, and extensive (13.6% vs 1.6%, p=0.01) plus dense (4.5% vs 1.6%, p>0.05) laminar medial collapse than males. Conclusion In our patient population, females have a lower prevalence of thoracic aortic disease treated with open repair. However, those who develop TAAD harbor a greater burden of wall pathology and probable worse outcomes. We recommend sex-based analysis of all research on thoracic aortic diseases.