Abstract
As a state that upholds the Pancasila as the nation's direction, Indonesia adjusts the values of human rights norms as the character of its country. Revealing divinity value as the first point in Pancasila Principle affects Indonesia's national policies and political views. However, this action is unsuitable for some court decisions granting sex-change cases. Some of the legal reasoning used in these decisions is considering human rights grounds by not considering the value of Pancasila principles. This article's purpose is to elaborate on the legal reasoning behind some court decisions that granted sex-change cases without medical grounds.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
