Abstract
To assess whether sevoflurane provides better haemodynamic stability than propofol in acute right ventricular (RV) ischaemia-reperfusion. Open-chest pigs (mean ± standard deviation, 68.8 ± 4.2 kg) anaesthetized with sevoflurane (n = 6) or propofol (n = 6) underwent 60 min of RV free wall ischaemia and 150 min of reperfusion. Haemodynamic parameters and blood flow in the 3 major coronary arteries were continuously monitored. Biomarkers of cardiac ischaemia were analysed. Mean arterial pressure and stroke volume decreased, whereas pulmonary vascular resistance increased equally in both groups. Heart rate increased 7.5% with propofol (P < 0.05) and 17% with sevoflurane (P < 0.05). At reperfusion, left atrial pressure and systemic vascular resistance decreased with sevoflurane. While RV stroke work (mmHg·ml) and cardiac output (l·min-1) decreased in the propofol group (4.2 ± 1.2 to 2.9 ± 1.7 and 2.65 ± 0.44 to 2.28 ± 0.56, respectively, P < 0.05 both), they recovered to baseline levels in the sevoflurane group (4.1 ± 1.5 to 4.0 ± 1.5 and 2.77 ± 0.6 to 2.6 ± 0.5, respectively, P > 0.05). Circumflex and left anterior descending coronary artery blood flow decreased in both groups. Right coronary artery blood flow (ml·min-1) decreased with propofol (38 ± 9 to 28 ± 9, P < 0.05), but not with sevoflurane (28 ± 11 to 28 ± 17, P > 0.05). Biomarkers of cardiac ischaemia increased in both groups. Compared to propofol, sevoflurane-anaesthetized pigs showed higher RV stroke work, cardiac output and right coronary artery blood flow during reperfusion. These findings warrant a clinical trial of sevoflurane in RV ischaemia in humans.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call