Abstract
Finite control set model predictive control (FCS-MPC), especially the reference-voltage-vector-based model predictive control (MPC) (RVV-MPC), considers a limited set of input vectors. However, the control performance is not satisfactory enough due to a severe lack of voltage input variants. In particular, additional restraints, such as limiting the currents within setting boundaries, could not be supported with RVV-MPC. In this article, to truly comply with the boundary settings, a reference variant FCS-MPC approach is introduced. In the proposed strategy, reference currents are considered under the maximum torque per current (MTPC) control. As boundary settings could not be supported in RVV-MPC, it is better to search for the optimal current reference that is feasible within the imposed boundaries. Therefore, rather than fixing the current reference, a well-considered neighborhood of the MTPC reference is introduced, and these variants are processed, resulting in a set of optimal candidate inputs. As multiple, but still finite, optimal solutions become possible, additional efforts can be made within the objective function to restrain the current and reduce the torque ripple. The size of the current reference space can be automatically adapted to generate current references that correspond to truly bounded current vectors. A trade-off is then made between control performance and meeting the boundary settings.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.