Abstract

Eutrophication caused by nutrient enrichment is a predominant stressor leading to lake degradation and, thus, the set-up of boundaries that support good ecological status, the Water Framework Directive’s main target, is a necessity. Greece is one of the Member States that have recorded delays in complying with the coherent management goals of European legislation. A wide range of different statistical approaches has been proposed in the Best Practice Guide for determining appropriate nutrient thresholds. To determine the nutrient thresholds supporting the good status of natural Greek lakes, the phytoplankton dataset gathered from the national monitoring programme (2015–2020) was used for shallow and deep natural lakes. The regression analyses were sufficient and robust in order to derive total phosphorus thresholds that ranged from 20 to 41 μg/L in shallow and 15–32 μg/L in deep natural lake types. Nutrient boundaries that encompass the stressors these lakes are subject to, are essential in proper lake management design.

Highlights

  • The Water Framework Directive (WFD) [1] specifies that for surface waters to be at “Good Ecological Status (GES)”, nutrient concentrations should not exceed the levels established so as to ensure the functioning of the ecosystem and the achievement of the values specified for the Biological Quality Elements (BQEs) [1]

  • This study aims at investigating the stressor–response relationship between phytoplankton community changes as expressed by Ecological Quality Ratio (EQR) and

  • The EQR values for each BQE were calculated as mean values, according to the respective WFD compliant national assessment methods [40,44,46,48,49] following the guidelines of WFD

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Water Framework Directive (WFD) [1] specifies that for surface waters to be at “Good Ecological Status (GES)”, nutrient concentrations should not exceed the levels established so as to ensure the functioning of the ecosystem and the achievement of the values specified for the Biological Quality Elements (BQEs) [1]. Key lessons learned are that water bodies respond differently to nutrient enrichment depending on category, type and geographical location and that the influence of confounding factors on the underlying nutrient-biology relationship can vary considerably [6,7,8,9,10]. This may lead to a “weak” or even to a wrong diagnosis of the cause(s) of failure to meet the ecological goals which in turn affects the suggested Program of Measures (PoMs) [11,12,13]. Establishing nutrient criteria has assumed greater importance as regulatory water agencies in numerous countries worldwide have extended their efforts to control eutrophication across all categories of water bodies [5,16,17,18,19]

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call