Serum crosslaps in comparison to serum osteocalcin and urinary bone resorption markers

Abstract

In this study we evaluated the routine practice and clinical application of serum crosslaps to urinary-crosslaps, -N-telopeptide-related fraction of type 1 collagen, -deoxpyridinoline, -totalpyridinoline and serum osteocalcin. The utility of both the serum and urine immunoassays for bone formation and resorption marker were tested in a cohort of 593 female and male patients from our outpatient clinic for osteology and rheumatology and compared to important osteoporosis risk factors like age, gender, E2 deficiency, bone density and chronic renal failure. The biochemical maker of bone formation, serum osteocalcin exhibit significant correlations to all five tested serum and urinary markers of bone resorption (p < 0.0001) crosswise to all different groups of patients. The group of chronic renal failure patients showed no significant correlation between the tested bone turnover parameters and the serum creatinine level except a significant increase and correlation for serum crosslaps and for the ratio of serum and urinary crosslaps. Associations between the age of the patients and the markers of bone turnover were rather poor. We found a significant, negative association between serum and urinary bone turnover markers and bone density and were interested, whether in patients with bone density < 2.5 SD an enhanced bone turnover could be detected in the same way as for E2 deficiency. Applying a discriminant analysis it was possible to discriminate between the patient with BD < 2.5 SD and those with BD > 1.0 SD with a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 65% using serum crosslaps. In case of urinary crosslaps the discriminatory power was slightly lower (sensitivity: 65.6%, specificity: 67.5%) and for serum osteocalcin the discriminatory power was negligible higher (sensitivity: 79%, specificity: 56%). The highly significant correlation between the urinary and serum crosslinked peptides by ELISA and serum osteocalcin supports the concept that these respective indices of bone formation and resorption both in urine and serum reflect a coupled process in vivo with sensitivity and specificity to pathological bone density, estrogen deficiency and chronic renal failure.