Abstract

Lymph node status is the most important prognostic factor in gastric cancer. Standard surgery, therefore, is radical subtotal or total gastrectomy with wide dissection of regional lymph nodes. Recently, the proportion of early gastric cancer has increased to more than 60% in Korea and Japan because of screening gastroscopy. The rate of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer ranges from 5 to 20%, which means that more than 80% of patients with early gastric cancer undergo unnecessarily wide excision of the stomach with aggressive lymphadenectomy. If there is a tool to predict the exact status of lymph nodes, radical gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy can be substituted with limited resection of stomach without lymph node dissection. However, preoperative endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography have limited accuracy for nodal staging in gastric cancer patients. The sentinel node (SN) concept has been introduced into various solid tumors, including stomach cancer, to predict lymph node status. Ideally, if the SN has no metastasis, extensive lymphadenectomy can be avoided, the extent of resection of the stomach reduced, function preserved, complications lessened, recovery accelerated, and the quality of life for the patient improved. SN navigation surgery has been widely performed for the treatment of breast cancer and malignant melanoma. Regarding gastric cancer, it seemed that SN concept is difficult to apply because the lymphatic flow is multidirectional. However, many studies reported that SN mapping is feasible in gastric cancer especially in early gastric cancer even though many issues still remain to be solved. Sensitivity of SN biopsy is highly important in gastric cancer compared with breast cancer and malignant melanoma. When false-negative cases develop in patients with malignant melanoma or breast cancer, other treatment options, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy exist. Because gastric cancer has no other treatment option except surgery, a gastric cancer patient with false-negative SN loses an opportunity for cure. The detection rate is not as important as sensitivity in gastric cancer SN biopsy. Surgeons should perform just conventional lymphadenectomy for detection failure cases. Sensitivities of SN mapping in gastric cancer reported until now are not adequate for clinical application. Until now, the sensitivities were generally low and even the studies with high sensitivity had small number of cases with lymph node metastasis. There are several methods to increase the sensitivity of SN biopsy in gastric cancer. As pathologic methods, multiple sections of the SN may raise the rate of detecting lymph node metastases. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining with anti-cytokeratin antibody helps to detect micrometastases in SNs in addition to conventional hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using tumor markers, such as carcinoembryonic antigen, cytokeratin, or CD44, also is good tool for molecular detection of SN micrometastases. Rapid IHC or real-time RT-PCR is needed so that IHC or RT-PCR is applicable to SN biopsy for gastric cancer. Takeuchi et al. 1 introduced a novel realtime multiplex RT-PCR assay that is suitable for intraoperative detection of micrometastasis in SNs for the patients with clinical N0 gastric carcinoma. In the present study, 31% of patients with no metastasis over histological diagnosis were RT-PCR positive and the diagnostic accuracy is significantly higher in their multiplex RT-PCR assay than in intraoperative histopathology. Because the time taken for the assay is just 80 minutes, real-time multiplex RT-PCR is thought to be applicable for use in the intraoperative diagnosis of SN. Society of Surgical Oncology 2011

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call