Sensory recovery in a split skin graft: pinprick or a thermal sensory analyzer?

Abstract

Sensory return in a split skin graft is an important factor in the protection of this graft from injury. Hence, three tests were compared: (1) the standard pain test using a simple pin, (2) the cold pain test, and (3) the hot pain test. Both the hot and cold pain tests were performed using the thermal sensory analyzer device. Thirteen patients were investigated; all had split skin grafts applied directly onto deep fascia after malignant melanoma excision on the lower limb. The period after grafting ranged from 4 to 15 years, and the mean age was 46.5 years. The normal contralateral side of each patient was used as the control for that patient. The results were collected in simple data tables and were analyzed using paired t tables for small samples with the level of significance set at p < 0.05. The standard pain test demonstrated that the split skin grafts applied on deep fascia did not recover sensation, even 15 years after surgery (p < 0.001). The hot and cold pain tests were both in agreement with the standard pain test at p < 0.001 and p < 0.03, respectively. The standard pain test is usually performed, as described in this study, using a pin, which is cheap and readily available in any plastic surgery and burn clinic. However, the cold and hot pain tests as performed here using the thermal sensory analyzer device are accurate but are costly, cumbersome, and not available in all clinics except for highly specialized units. Hence, the author would like to dispel the myth that the standard pain test is inaccurate. This might be so in testing sensation in "normal" skin but not in testing the recovery of sensation in a skin graft.