Abstract

Abstract. Projecting water deficit under various possible future climate scenarios depends on the choice of general circulation model (GCM), reference evapotranspiration (ET0) estimation method, and Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) trajectory. The relative contribution of each of these factors must be evaluated in order to choose an appropriate ensemble of future scenarios for water resources planning. In this study variance-based global sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo filtering were used to evaluate the relative sensitivity of projected changes in precipitation (P), ET0, and water deficit (defined here as P–ET0) to choice of GCM, ET0 estimation method, and RCP trajectory over the continental United States (US) for two distinct future periods: 2030–2060 (future period 1) and 2070–2100 (future period 2). A total of 9 GCMs, 10 ET0 methods, and 3 RCP trajectories were used to quantify the range of future projections and estimate the relative sensitivity of future projections to each of these factors. In general, for all regions of the continental US, changes in future precipitation are most sensitive to the choice of GCM, while changes in future ET0 are most sensitive to the choice of ET0 estimation method. For changes in future water deficit, the choice of GCM is the most influential factor in the cool season (December–March), and the choice of ET0 estimation method is most important in the warm season (May–October) for all regions except the Southeast US, where GCMs and ET0 have approximately equal influence throughout most of the year. Although the choice of RCP trajectory is generally less important than the choice of GCM or ET0 method, the impact of RCP trajectory increases in future period 2 over future period 1 for all factors. Monte Carlo filtering results indicate that particular GCMs and ET0 methods drive the projection of wetter or drier future conditions much more than RCP trajectory; however, the set of GCMs and ET0 methods that produce wetter or drier projections varies substantially by region. Results of this study indicate that, in addition to using an ensemble of GCMs and several RCP trajectories, a range of regionally relevant ET0 estimation methods should be used to develop a robust range of future conditions for water resources planning under climate change.

Highlights

  • Climate change will result in significant impacts on hydrologic processes

  • The NCADAC report indicated that Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) general circulation model (GCM) precipitation projections show a consistent increase in Alaska and the far north of the continental United States (US) and a consistent decrease in the far Southwest US, but that GCM projections are inconsistent in the precipitation transition zone of the US continent

  • This study clearly shows that the uncertainty caused by different GCMs, ET0 methods, and Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) trajectories makes actionable water resources planning based on climate change projections difficult

Read more

Summary

Introduction

S. Chang et al.: Sensitivity of future continental United States water deficit projections quality of water resources. The most recent report of the National Climate Assessment and Development Advisory Committee (NCADAC, Melillo et al, 2014) indicated that the average annual temperature in the United States (US) has increased by 0.7 to 0.9 ◦C since record keeping began in 1895 and is expected to continue to rise (Georgakakos et al, 2014; Walsh et al, 2014). The uncertainty in climate change projections makes actionable water resources planning difficult in many regions. In order to predict changes in the hydrologic cycle, and future water supply and demand, estimates of changes in P , T , and ET0 must be evaluated on a regional basis, and the uncertainty of these estimates must be quantified (Ishak et al, 2010)

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call