Abstract

Timely assessment of acetaminophen concentration in overdose situations is not always available in resource‐poor settings. The 150 mg/kg dose‐estimate for acetaminophen is widely considered as criterion for acetaminophen overdose. Its sensitivity and specificity when compared to the 150 mg/L treatment line on the Rumack‐Matthew Nomogram (150‐treatment line) has rarely been evaluated. This is a retrospective chart review of acute acetaminophen overdose patients. We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the 150, 200 mg/kg and 8‐ and 10‐g dose‐estimates by plotting the serum acetaminophen levels and using 150‐treatment line on the Nomogram as the treatment cut‐off. A comparison of medical care costs was performed. We enrolled 784 cases for analysis. Median (IQR) age was 23 (20–28) years (81.9% female). There were 545 cases (69.5%) where the estimated ingested acetaminophen dose were ≥150 mg/kg and 406 cases (51.8%) with concentrations ≥150‐treatment line. Hepatotoxicity and acute liver injury (ALI) occurred in 7.3% and 23.9%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of 150 mg/kg dose‐estimate for the 150‐treatment line were 92.6% (95% CI 89.6, 94.8) and 55.3% (95% CI 50.3, 60.2). Among patients with dose‐estimate below150 mg/kg, none developed hepatotoxicity and 17 (7.1%) develop ALI. The administration of activated charcoal significantly decreased the risk of being above the 150‐treatment line by half. In resource‐poor setings, the use of 150 mg/kg dose‐estimate as a stand‐alone criteria for initiation of N‐acetylcysteine therapy is satisfactory, especially when combined with decontamination with activated charcoal and follow up of aminotransferase at 24 h.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call