Abstract

Given that existing fire risk models often ignore human and organizational errors (HOEs) ultimately leading to underestimation of risks by as much as 80%, this study employs a technical-human-organizational risk (T-H-O-Risk) methodology to address knowledge gaps in current state-of-the-art probabilistic risk analysis (PRA) for high-rise residential buildings with the following goals: (1) Develop an improved PRA methodology to address concerns that deterministic, fire engineering approaches significantly underestimate safety levels that lead to inaccurate fire safety levels. (2) Enhance existing fire safety verification methods by incorporating probabilistic risk approach and HOEs for (i) a more inclusive view of risk, and (ii) to overcome the deterministic nature of current verification methods. (3) Perform comprehensive sensitivity and uncertainty analyses to address uncertainties in numerical estimates used in fault tree/event trees, Bayesian network and system dynamics and their propagation in a probabilistic model. (4) Quantification of human and organizational risks for high-rise residential buildings which contributes towards a policy agenda in the direction of a sustainable, risk-based regulatory regime. This research contributes to the development of the next-generation building codes and risk assessment methodologies.

Highlights

  • Probabilistic modelling of fire safety risks in high-rise residential buildings typically has included technical risks and errors, while ignoring the impacts of human and organizational risks resulting in significant underestimation of overall risks

  • Sci. 2021, 11, 2590 inclusive estimate of overall fire risk [27,28,29]. While this approach enables an integrated analysis of human and organizational errors (HOEs) and their nonlinear interactions and feedbacks, it generally results in a higher level of uncertainty, detailed sensitivity and uncertainty analyses are performed to assess the model robustness and reliability of model outputs

  • RC—Robustness Check, failure of a critical part of the fire safety system will not result in the design not meeting objectives of the National Construction Code (NCC)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Probabilistic modelling of fire safety risks in high-rise residential buildings typically has included technical risks and errors, while ignoring the impacts of human and organizational risks resulting in significant underestimation of overall risks. Sci. 2021, 11, 2590 inclusive estimate of overall fire risk [27,28,29] While this approach enables an integrated analysis of HOEs and their nonlinear interactions and feedbacks, it generally results in a higher level of uncertainty, detailed sensitivity and uncertainty analyses are performed to assess the model robustness and reliability of model outputs. It is important to determine the degree of uncertainty in the T-H-O-Risk methodology to assess the efficacy and reliability of the model for effective fire safety measures in high-rise residential buildings.

Characteristic Overview
Methodology
T-H-O-Risk Framework
Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis
Case studies
Probability Analysis of Human and Organizational Errors
Event and Fault Tree
Bayesian Network
Design Scenario Fire blocks evacuation route
Design
Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analyses of HOE Variables and ERL
Sensitivity Analysis of HOE Variables and ERL
Uncertainty Analysis of HOE and ERL
Design DTS
10 Number of Fatalities
Findings
Assessment of Robustness of SD Model Outputs
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call