Abstract

Present study determines sensitivity of different input and dissipation parameterization schemes available in a third-generation wind-wave model, WAVEWATCH III for Indian Ocean (IO), using collocated altimeter and in-situ buoy measurements. For IO, in general, parameterization by Bidlot et al. (2005, referred as BAJ) is found to be the best in simulating SWH, for all the seasons. Albeit NIO is a part of IO, wave climate over this region is different as it exhibits variability in surface wind conditions before, after and during the monsoon phase. Thus, over NIO during pre- and post- monsoon seasons, when the region is dominated by swells propagating from the south, KC (KC denotes Kahma and Calkoen (1992, 1994)) stable parameterization scheme of Tolman and Chalikov (1996) is the better option for input and dissipation source function. During monsoon season, waves over NIO is primarily influenced by strong and persistent southwest monsoonal winds and dominated by young wind seas. BAJ parameterization is suggested as the better option during this phase. To simulate the high waves induced by tropical cyclones, KC stable parameterization of Tolman and Chalikov (1996) is found suitable.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.