Abstract
The world has witnessed corporate scandals of monstrosity magnitude. The Enron Scandal, the Nike Sweatshop scandal and the recent Johnson and Johnson baby talc in 2018 are some dishonors that reshaped the business world and reinvigorated the importance of business ethics. Indeed, supranational and national movements such as the Global Reporting Initiatives have responded to these scandals by imposing stricter corporate reporting to instill greater transparency and corporate responsibility. Ironically, despite unwavering efforts, corporations are still blatantly flouting regulations. The Volkswagen “diesel dupe” crisis is a stark reminder of the inherent weakness of current regulations. Despite Volkswagen’s staunch adherence to those stringent reporting guidelines, they breached ethics to the core, creating a tsunami of vehicle recalls, massive social, political and legal repercussions. Volkswagen’s cheat device is a ‘creative destruction’ that challenged the fundamental usefulness of corporate reporting. Corporate social responsibility has evolved tremendously, now taking the form of positivistic reporting patterns. Corporations are measured by their ecological, social and economic performance where they flamboyantly table those data and information to garner stakeholders’ support and legitimacy. However, a pragmatic approach towards corporate social responsibility is self-defeating. It erodes and dilutes a corporation’s ability to make sense, communicate and adapt to their externalities. Instead, corporations boast of their corporate prowess and triple bottom line. Using Volkswagen as a subject, this paper exposes the inherent weaknesses of a positivistic corporate reporting approach to social responsibility. A positivistic approach such as this cannot engender a truthful, honest and open posture in business corporations. Instead, this paper exemplifies that a meaningful sensemaking corporate social responsibility instills reflexive organisation change and moral transpose within corporations. This paper underlines this reflexive organisational change and moral transpose in Volkswagen as they encounter the diesel crisis. This study is novel and greatly enhances previous literatures in corporate social responsibility by instilling an appropriate model to underline these momentous reflexive organisational changes and moral transformations in Volkswagen.
Highlights
The world has witnessed many major trepidations of unethical businesses
Despite the usefulness of sensemaking corporate social responsibility (CSR) in depicting the reflexive values of organisation change and a firm’s moral transpose, they suffer from some inherent limitations
The current authors fill this gap by addressing the issues of sensemaking CSR on reflexive organisation change and their moral transpose
Summary
The world has witnessed many major trepidations of unethical businesses. The 1984 Bhopal Disaster, the 1997 Nike Sweatshop Scandal, the Deepwater Horizon Oil spill in 2010, the Apple Foxconn scandal in 2017 and the most recent Johnson and Johnson (J&J) baby talc scandal in 2018 are some stark examples of unethical business. While positivistic movements have improved corporate reporting styles and instilled sophisticated tabulations and data, overt emphasis on CSR contents prevents firms from truly appreciating and understanding the intrinsic intents of CSR (Brickson, 2007). This results in a vacuum for appreciating the underlying psychological and anthropological reasoning in CSR deployments. Described as a process in which an individual or an organisation develops their cognitive connection with the environment (Ring & Rands, 1989), sensemaking perceives CSR activities as not merely a positivistic measurable scheme, but how a business firm connects and adapts to their externality. This is consistent with the enactment model of organisational learning (Weick, 1995) which ascribed firms as constantly reflecting their evolving role in the business environment
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have