Sense and nonsense concerning biotin interference in laboratory tests

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Biotin supplementation (mainly OTC preparations) has gained popularity. There are concerns about biotin interference in immunoassays and potential misdiagnosis, especially since the discovery of high dose therapy in MS. This review summarizes the dangers of biotin usage and possible countermeasures. Methods Immunoassays design determines whether positive or negative analytical errors may occur. Techniques using biotinylated reagent and biotin binding proteins may generate errors. In sandwich immunoassays, biotin causes lowered results. Competitive immunoassays are more vulnerable: biotin usage causes false increased results. The interference is platform dependent. Parameters vary in their susceptibility: a combination of false positives and negatives mimicking a coherent profile is dangerous, e.g. combining falsely lowered TSH with falsely elevated FT4/FT3 mimicking hyperthyreosis. Other susceptible parameters are thyroglobulin, DHEA-S, estradiol, testosterone, ferritin, progesterone, Vitamin D, Vitamin B12, PSA, PTH, LH, FSH, Troponins I and T, Pro-BNP. Digoxin and PSA may also be affected. Tumor markers and ß-hCG are robust. Inserts of serological markers of HIV, hepatitis B and C warn for biotin interference. Results Manufacturers have made assays less vulnerable for biotin interference. In doubtful cases, it is helpful to determine testosterone in females and estrogen in males. Both are elevated if biotin interference is present. Biotin supplementation should be discontinued. However, this is impossible in MS patients needing biotin, as interrupting this medication is discouraged. Conclusions Solutions to overcome this interference are: informing patients prior to analysis (avoiding peak biotin values when sampling), choice of appropriate immunoassays, and use of biotin removing steps prior to analysis.