Single center, real-world retrospective study of CAR-T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma beyond second line: five-year results at the University Hospitals Leuven

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

ABSTRACT Introduction Large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL) are the most frequently aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has emerged as a new, powerful treatment for relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease. Two CAR-T cell products, tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel,) and axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), are reimbursed in Belgium for R/R LBCL beyond second line. Objectives and methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study to report the outcome with tisa-cel and axi-cel for R/R LBCL beyond second line in the years 2019–2023 at the University Hospitals Leuven for 79 patients selected for apheresis and CAR-T infusion. Results Eleven patients (14%) did not proceed to CAR-T cell infusion. For infused patients (n = 68), the best overall response rate (ORR)/complete response (CR) rate was 64%/49% for tisa-cel and 88%/66% for axi-cel (p = 0.04 for ORR). After a median follow-up of 13.8 months, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 1 year were 30% and 43% for tisa-cel and 48% and 62% for axi-cel. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) (all grades/grade ≥3) occurred in 82%/9% after tisa-cel and in 97%/0% after axi-cel. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) (all grades/grade ≥3) occurred in 24%/18% after tisa-cel and in 54%/40% after axi-cel. The non-relapse mortality in the infusion cohort was 13%. Conclusion Our real-world data show high and durable response rates, with a non-significant trend towards a higher efficacy and higher toxicity for axi-cel compared to tisa-cel. Our results are in line with other real-world registries except for a shorter median OS and more high-grade ICANS.