Abstract

Historic topographic maps, which are georeferenced and made publicly available by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) and the National Map’s Historical Topographic Map Collection (HTMC), are a valuable source of historic land cover and land use (LCLU) information that could be used to expand the historic record when combined with data from moderate spatial resolution Earth observation missions. This is especially true for landscape disturbances that have a long and complex historic record, such as surface coal mining in the Appalachian region of the eastern United States. In this study, we investigate this specific mapping problem using modified UNet semantic segmentation deep learning (DL), which is based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and a large example dataset of historic surface mine disturbance extents from the USGS Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center (GGGSC). The primary objectives of this study are to (1) evaluate model generalization to new geographic extents and topographic maps and (2) to assess the impact of training sample size, or the number of manually interpreted topographic maps, on model performance. Using data from the state of Kentucky, our findings suggest that DL semantic segmentation can detect surface mine disturbance features from topographic maps with a high level of accuracy (Dice coefficient = 0.902) and relatively balanced omission and commission error rates (Precision = 0.891, Recall = 0.917). When the model is applied to new topographic maps in Ohio and Virginia to assess generalization, model performance decreases; however, performance is still strong (Ohio Dice coefficient = 0.837 and Virginia Dice coefficient = 0.763). Further, when reducing the number of topographic maps used to derive training image chips from 84 to 15, model performance was only slightly reduced, suggesting that models that generalize well to new data and geographic extents may not require a large training set. We suggest the incorporation of DL semantic segmentation methods into applied workflows to decrease manual digitizing labor requirements and call for additional research associated with applying semantic segmentation methods to alternative cartographic representations to supplement research focused on multispectral image analysis and classification.

Highlights

  • Patterns of land cover and land use (LCLU) change can be very complex, especially when investigated over long time periods and/or in areas with multiple and changing drivers of alteration [1,2,3,4,5,6]

  • Given the complexity of extracting such features, in this study, we investigate the use of deep learning (DL), modified UNet semantic segmentation using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) as a technique for extracting surface mine features from historic topographic maps

  • This study highlights the value of DL semantic segmentation methods for extracting data from historic topographic maps, which offer a valuable record of historic landscape conditions that can be combined with more recent data, such as those derived from moderate spatial resolution satellite imagery, for extending the LCLU change record and more completely quantifying anthropogenic landscape alterations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Patterns of land cover and land use (LCLU) change can be very complex, especially when investigated over long time periods and/or in areas with multiple and changing drivers of alteration [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The Landsat program, which first collected data in the early 1970s and currently collects data with the instruments onboard Landsat 8, has been used to map changes across the United States (US) as part of the National Land Cover Database (NLCD) [5,6]. Such products have a limited historic scope since moderate spatial resolution Earth observation data from civilian sensors only extend back to the early 1970s, with more frequent collections and finer temporal resolutions only offered more recently [11,12]. In order to more completely document and quantify the historic extent and associated impacts of LCLU change, additional data sources should be investigated

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call