A semantic segmentation method with category boundary for Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) mapping of Very-High Resolution (VHR) remote sensing image

Abstract

ABSTRACT Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is widely used for semantic segmentation and land-use and land-cover (LULC) mapping of very high-resolution (VHR) remote sensing images. The convolution operation is a powerful method for VHR classification, but the loss of high-frequency detail information caused during its operation decreases the classification accuracy, particularly in the boundary. Thus, it is necessary to supply additional boundary information to the CNN for alleviating this situation. In the classification task (and in LULC mapping), providing more effective information generates a better classification result. Current methods regard the boundary of images as the same category object and process it uniformly, which loses a notable amount of useful information because of the different properties, such as ambiguity and transition, between remote sensing images and their boundaries. Thus, a semantic segmentation method with category boundary for LULC mapping is proposed in this paper. First, a multi-task CNN called the category boundary detection network (CBDN) is designed to extract the boundary information of different category objects. Second, this category boundary and VHR images are used for initial semantic segmentation. Finally, the category boundary and the initial semantic segmentation result (ISSR) are fused to obtain the final LULC map by a two-step strategy, including the explicit fusion and the boundary attention loss function. To verify whether category boundary improved the classification accuracy, a set of comparative experiments were conducted on the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS) Vaihingen and Potsdam datasets. The method in this paper was compared with a semantic segmentation method with no boundary information and a semantic segmentation method with global boundary. The results showed that the proposed method in this paper achieved good performances in the Vaihingen (overall accuracy (OA) = 0.924, Kappa coefficient (K) = 0.898, mean F1 score (mF1) = 0.896 and mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) = 0.817) and Potsdam datasets (OA = 0.890, K = 0.857, mF1 = 0.923, and mIoU = 0.860) based on the eroded labels.