Abstract

We can retain only a portion of the visual information that we encounter within our visual working memory. Which factors influence how much information we can remember? Recent studies have demonstrated that the capacity of visual working memory is influenced by the type of information to be remembered and is greater for real-world objects than for abstract stimuli. One explanation for this effect is that the semantic knowledge associated with real-world objects makes them easier to maintain in working memory. Previous studies have indirectly tested this proposal and led to inconsistent conclusions. Here, we directly tested whether semantic knowledge confers a benefit for visual working memory by using familiar and unfamiliar real-world objects. We found a mnemonic benefit for familiar objects in adults and children between the ages of 4 and 9 years. Control conditions ruled out alternative explanations, namely the possibility that the familiar objects could be more easily labeled or that there were differences in low-level visual features between the two types of objects. Together, these findings demonstrate that semantic knowledge influences visual working memory, which suggests that the capacity of visual working memory is not fixed but instead fluctuates depending on what has to be remembered.

Highlights

  • Visual working memory is a system that enables us to maintain and manipulate visual information in our minds [1]

  • Visual working memory capacity, as measured by K [2], was significantly higher for familiar compared to unfamiliar images in the standard image condition (familiar: K = 4.08; unfamiliar: K = 3.53; paired t-test: t(18) = 3.28, p = .004, Cohen’s d = .723), but did not differ for between the two types of morphed images familiar: K = 3.16; unfamiliar: K = 3.26; paired ttest: t(18) = -0.65, p = .523, Cohen’s d = -.126)

  • Digit recall accuracy was very high (M = 96.13%), which confirms that the participants were actively keeping the digits in mind while performing the change detection task. These results demonstrate that there is a benefit in visual working memory for familiar compared to unfamiliar objects, and that this benefit does not stem from labeling strategies or differences in low-level visual features

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Visual working memory is a system that enables us to maintain and manipulate visual information in our minds [1]. One of the hallmark features of visual working memory is that it is capacity-limited: it does not consist of the entire contents of the visual information we encounter, but instead only a subset [2]. Classic studies of visual working memory using simple shapes or colored squares have demonstrated that the average person can maintain approximately four items in working memory [3]. Recent research has demonstrated that visual working memory capacity is influenced by the type of visual information to be remembered [4,5,6,7,8,9]. With 200 ms of encoding time, visual working memory capacity was similar for colored

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call