Abstract

Many studies on working memory have assumed that one can determine an individual's fixed memory capacity. In the current study, we took an individual differences approach to investigate whether visual working memory (VWM) capacity was stable irrespective of the number of to-be-remembered objects and participant age. Younger and older adults performed a change detection task using several objects defined by color. Results showed wide variability in VWM capacity across memory set sizes, age, and individuals. A marked decrease in the number of objects held in VWM was observed in both younger and older adults with low memory capacity, but not among high-capacity individuals, when set size went well beyond the limits of VWM capacity. In addition, a decrease in the number of objects held in VWM was alleviated among low-capacity younger adults by increasing VWM encoding time; however, increasing encoding time did not benefit low-capacity older adults. These findings suggest that low-capacity individuals are likely to show decreases in VWM capacity induced by overload, and aging exacerbates this deficit such that it cannot be recovered by simply increasing encoding time. Overall, our findings challenge the prevailing assumption that VWM capacity is fixed and stable, encouraging a revision to the strict view that VWM capacity is constrained by a fixed number of distinct “slots” in which high-resolution object representations are stored.

Highlights

  • It has long been assumed that humans can concurrently hold 3 to 4 objects in visual working memory (VWM) (Luck and Vogel, 1997; Cowan, 2001)

  • Results of the present study demonstrate the instability of VWM capacity, as assessed with a change detection task, based on factors related to age and overload

  • We found a decrease in the number of items held in VWM when low-capacity and/or older individuals are required to remember several objects that exceeded their capacity limit

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It has long been assumed that humans can concurrently hold 3 to 4 objects in visual working memory (VWM) (Luck and Vogel, 1997; Cowan, 2001). Using a change detection paradigm in which participants are required to detect a change between sample and test displays, these studies found a decrease in VWM capacity with overload (i.e., set sizes were large enough to exceed the canonical number of the VWM capacity limit). The authors found that a decrease in VWM capacity at large set sizes occurred only during change detection task, and the decline was more severe among participants with lower fluid intelligence, as measured by Cattell’s (1973) culture fair test Based on these findings, it was suggested that a change detection paradigm, but not a whole report paradigm, imposes maladaptive encoding strategies on participants ( those with lower intelligence) at large set sizes, thereby decreasing the number of objects held in VWM. Considering the diverse influences of aging on working memory (Cowan et al, 2006; Logie and Maylor, 2009; Brockmole and Logie, 2013), further investigation is warranted

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call