Abstract

Dense granular flows can spontaneously self-channelise by forming a pair of parallel-sided static levees on either side of a central flowing channel. This process prevents lateral spreading and maintains the flow thickness, and hence mobility, enabling the grains to run out considerably further than a spreading flow on shallow slopes. Since levees commonly form in hazardous geophysical mass flows, such as snow avalanches, debris flows, lahars and pyroclastic flows, this has important implications for risk management in mountainous and volcanic regions. In this paper an avalanche model that incorporates frictional hysteresis, as well as depth-averaged viscous terms derived from the $\unicode[STIX]{x1D707}(I)$-rheology, is used to quantitatively model self-channelisation and levee formation. The viscous terms are crucial for determining a smoothly varying steady-state velocity profile across the flowing channel, which has the important property that it does not exert any shear stresses at the levee–channel interfaces. For a fixed mass flux, the resulting boundary value problem for the velocity profile also uniquely determines the width and height of the channel, and the predictions are in very good agreement with existing experimental data for both spherical and angular particles. It is also shown that in the absence of viscous (second-order gradient) terms, the problem degenerates, to produce plug flow in the channel with two frictionless contact discontinuities at the levee–channel margins. Such solutions are not observed in experiments. Moreover, the steady-state inviscid problem lacks a thickness or width selection mechanism and consequently there is no unique solution. The viscous theory is therefore a significant step forward. Fully time-dependent numerical simulations to the viscous model are able to quantitatively capture the process in which the flow self-channelises and show how the levees are initially emplaced behind the flow head. Both experiments and numerical simulations show that the height and width of the channel are not necessarily fixed by these initial values, but respond to changes in the supplied mass flux, allowing narrowing and widening of the channel long after the initial front has passed by. In addition, below a critical mass flux the steady-state solutions become unstable and time-dependent numerical simulations are able to capture the transition to periodic erosion–deposition waves observed in experiments.

Highlights

  • Self-channelisation and levee formation can occur in a wide range of geophysical mass flows that take place in volcanic and mountainous regions throughout the world

  • The thickness H ∈ [Hmin, Hmax] ≈ [7.9, 9.2] mm is almost constant and asymptotes to Hmin as QM → ∞. This is significantly above hstop = 5 mm and h∗ = 6.7 mm. These observations are consistent with the experiments of Takagi et al (2011) with 300–600 μm angular sand particles on a 32◦ slope who found that maximum flow thickness stayed approximately constant at a value of H = 8.3 ± 0.4 mm as the mass flux was increased as shown in figure 10(a)

  • This paper shows that two physical processes are needed to quantitatively predict self-channelisation and levee formation in monodisperse granular flows using depth-averaged avalanche models

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Self-channelisation and levee formation can occur in a wide range of geophysical mass flows that take place in volcanic and mountainous regions throughout the world. On the other hand, the inflow mass flux is increased to QM = 27.0 ± 0.1 g s−1 a new stable width W = 5.70 ± 0.05 cm rapidly develops by levee-bank overtopping (figure 4c) and the history, preserved in the old stacked levees, is erased The significance of this process is that it may allow information about the time history of natural geophysical flows to be inferred from the deposit, for example from sequences of subtly stacked levees that occur in pyroclastic deposits (Rowley et al 1981; Wilson & Head 1981; Branney & Kokelaar 1992; Calder et al 2000). Two-dimensional time-dependent numerical solutions of this viscous avalanche model are able to explicitly compute how channels with the correct steady-state thickness and width are established dynamically, as well as allowing more complex unsteady flows to be investigated

Depth-averaged model
The effective basal friction law
Depth-averaged kinematic viscosity
Fully developed self-channelised flow
Steady-state depth-averaged equations in the flowing channel
Inviscid solutions
Viscous solutions for the central flowing channel
Shear-band structure adjacent to the levees
Comparison with experiments
Reconstruction of the smoothly varying velocity field
Numerical method
Formation and partial drainage of a self-channelised flow
Narrowing and widening of the central flowing channel
Unsteady periodic avalanching regime
Summary of results
Findings
Implications for the interpretation of levee–channel deposits
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call